Video mixer questions

Category: Unknown · Tags: — · Posts: 11


#1 — Traviss · 2019-05-28

Hi!

I don’t have any experience with video mixers and I was hoping if I get one I would be able to mix my television’s output with a live video camera output with that camera focused on the television screen. Would I encounter any sync issues with this or could I go as far as to get a cheap / basic mixer to accomplish this without any issues?

Is there anything else I should consider seeing as this mixer will be used with my LZX and BPMC gear?

Thanks!!!


#2 — transistorcat · 2019-05-28

Some mixers have a built in TBC (like the edirol v4/v8), and if so it will be fine. otherwise you need to have a camera with genlock or some way of synchronizing the inputs.


#3 — Traviss · 2019-05-29

Thanks Transistorcat, looks like I need to get myself a mixer with TBC, cheers!

:slight_smile:


#4 — sean · 2019-05-29

In case you haven’t searched, there are several other threads about mixers:

Thanks in advance for any suggestions … > I’m looking for a budget video mixer, and thought the Panasonic MX-50 might be a good place to start. Problem is, the only MX-50 mixers I can find online are listed for ‘parts’. > Any ideas on where I could find a used MX-50 mixer ? or something equivalent? > I’m a n00b, so want to buy good quality but don’t want to spend crazy either. > Regards, > JayB.>

ive seen a bunch of people using edirol mixers. any other good options? > “videonics mxpro mx3000 pro” seem to be pretty cheap on ebay. > would like to hear your thoughts.>

#5 — barto · 2019-05-29

the old panasonc video mixers are nice but bulky and possibly noisy. i like the edirol mixers since they are small and packed with features


#6 — Robbertunist · 2020-09-12

Has anyone ever used both the Edirol V4 and the V8? I have a well used V4 & like it but just saw a V8 come up on offer for a cheap price & apparently with little use. I’m tempted.


#7 — Dewb · 2020-09-12

I have both and use them in different situations. The extra four input channels on the V8 are very handy, as are the S-video and VGA ports. I prefer the V8 blackout slider over the V4 blackout knob. On the other hand, the V4 is smaller, lighter, and creates more classic noisy feedback blooms.


#8 — sean · 2020-09-12

The differences that make an upgrade to a V8 100% worth it for me:

  1. Very usable built-in feedback effects (one of which is actually a framebuffer delay)
  2. One channel of VGA in, for easy computer input
  3. Loop thru of all the inputs

More discussion of V8 here, incl. video examples of feedback effects.


#9 — Robbertunist · 2020-09-14

Thanks @Dewb & @sean for the info & the link

:+1:t3:

I wasn’t aware of the feedback effect or of the VGA in.


#10 — fgnermood · 2023-07-19

Hey :))

Thx for these details ! Does anyone know if the edirol V-440-HD also include a TBC that worth it ?


#11 — wednesdayayay · 2023-07-20

@fgnermood

I used the V440 as the heart of a system for several years and never had sync issues.

I have since moved on and have one to sell if you need one.

my biggest hurdle with sync was always VHS input and back when I was using the V440 as the heart I had the VHS playback deck coming into a V4 which came into the SD side of the V440.

however I also used to capture various VHS tapes I found via VHS deck > V440 > BMD hyper intensity shuttle > computer so I know it works.

just looking at the block diagram now

static.roland.comhttps://static.roland.com/assets/media/pdf/v440hd_block_diagram.pdfhttps://static.roland.com/assets/media/pdf/v440hd_block_diagram.pdf248.46 KB

Link: v440hd_block_diagram.pdf

it looks like each of the 4 busses has a frame synchronizer